Scotus decisions free#

The justices will be answering the question of whether applying a law 'to compel an artist to speak or stay silent violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.'.sexual orientation' violates her First Amendment rights. The court is hearing a free-speech caseof a Colorado-based web designer who says she should not be forced to create websites for same-sex weddings under state law.ĭetails: Lorie Smith's attorneys argue that a federal court siding with a Colorado law that says she must 'work with all people regardless of. What we're watching: If the Supreme Court sides with the doctrine in question, it would grant state lawmakers the power over redistricting and election procedures, such as voting by mail, The Washington Post reports. The North Carolina Supreme Court said that this would be 'repugnant to the sovereignty of states' and 'would produce absurd and dangerous consequences.'.Republican lawmakers said that the state court lacks the authority to reject the map under a legal theory called the independent state legislature doctrine, which is derived from the U.S.This case examines a legal theory that would grant state legislatures significantly more power over federal elections.ĭetails: The case involves a map drawn by North Carolina's Republican-led legislature that was rejected by the state's supreme court for partisan gerrymandering and violating the state constitution. Here's a look at some of the most prominent cases the court has already agreed to hear. Wade - and setting new ones on religion and guns.ĭriving the news: With a 6-3 majority, the next term - which is set to start in October - could be just as big. The most recent Supreme Court term ended with its conservative majority getting rid of major precedents - most notably Roe v.

Scotus decisions