If he has another season like last he will improve maybe 5-6 ovr points. so the rate the improvement is expressed takes more time. Yu can justify w numbers a rapid increase in ratings bc tds and yards and completion % is easy to see OL dnt have that luxury. Its different for olineman bc yu can’t quantitatively justify if they’re good or bad. You claimed that for oline it was a cumulative based on all their years but with skilled positions since they have more tangible skill sets, their ratings can be based on less information. Again, a lot of the Madden ratings leave me scratching my head.īut according to you, it's not the same for every player.

But that doesn't have anything to do with real life and an actual players ratings. For example, if somewhere were to play Madden 2019 through the 2019 season and then start the 2020 season, players ratings would increase/decrease based on the games algorithms. Of course in the game a player is going to increase/decrease based on certain items. I'm just saying their previous method was flawed and their new method is flawed as well.īut you are equating real life to the game. It's not evident from your postsĪnd I accepted that. Mahomes started the year at a 80 and threw for 4tds a week and climbed to a 95 ovr. just because yu have NELSON as the best G wn the league, he has to show a marginal improvement on a consistent trajectory to get a higher rating. Ratings increase and decline throughout the season. my reasoning is based on the facts the games has given me to wrk with.Īnd of course yu have to take en a players past year for context of a new season en regards to madden bc that’s the foundation of where that player will begin the new season. Im not saying it’s gospel im telling yu why a player is rated what they’re rated. i’m smart and there aren’t too many flaws if any en my logic. “jumping” lol y’all are slow i compared Leonard to another rookie who leonard had a better season than. So which is it? Are their ratings the gospel like you want to believe or are they flawed? It's funny, you (or should I say yu) jump on people because they don't buy the Madden ratings and then you complain about DL be rated lower than Vander. so it’s a revamping of logic where a players 19 rating isn’t equal to a 20 rating.' So based on that, then it should not matter what the history was, it should just be based on soley on this years player evaluation. it comes w time due to the position.īut wait a minute, according to you Madden has 'a new system where there’s a rating gap between the best and worst players. Martin was rated a 78ovr (83rb/84pb/89str) as a rookie and through his play combined w league wide recognition earned a a current 96 ovr. I’m already speaking too much about what is really common sense. As Nelson progresses and establishes his name the ratings will reflect that. Martin is an established lineman that has proven his ability to earn and maintain these numbers.

Nelson having an 82 for awareness is just silly, he is the best O.Lineman I have seen since Larry Allen.Īll the numbers are thresholds. however I don't think it has anything to do with making trench players 'earn' their ratings vs skill players but rather more to do with either laziness or being too cheap to hire people who can (more) accurately grade trench players. I get that and agree you're likely right. Your overarching point it seems is basically that EA Sports does a better job of setting the ratings for skill players than they do for trench players and it's because they don't care as much about trench players. It's easy to see a skill gap between good OL and bad OL as well so I'm not buying that argument. I honestly have no idea what you're trying to say here. Members of one position group shouldn't have to 'earn' their rating while others don't. But they're striving for the most accurate experience as possible and if what you say is true then they should really change up their ratings process.

Malist of madden 20 veterans